That " Cross " does not hang around her neck for no strategic reason.
Does justice mean truth, or does it mean process? The jury, it appears, it still out.
The key to public bewilderment (and the fury of victims' relatives) on these and other decisions lies in an observation by law professor Christine Corcos, of Louisiana State University, in 1997. She said the public and lawyers differed about whether justice meant truth or justice meant process. This meant English-speaking lawyers were outnumbered about 500-1 on the issue of truth or procedure. If we add in European lawyers and judges who believe justice means truth, the odds are about 1000-1....... The law of diminishing reality
But too many times these days juries – and judges sitting alone – are handing down verdicts when all the evidence has not been presented to the court..... Just think what those jurors are thinking as they read all the stuff they were not allowed to know while supposedly examining ALL the evidence and then making a learned judgement. A dangerously sick joke our judicial system at times. Criminally insane.
AND YOU THOUGHT SHE WAS AN ISOLATED CASE.
Who did it?
Was she justifiably acquited?
Was it the evidence that swayed the jury?
Or was it simply a case of "them versus us?"
What "them versus us?"
An argument as old as the Crusades.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
An all Christian Jury.
And yes that " Cross " does not hang around her neck for no strategic reason.
Put yourself in their shoes.
Here is a chance to "rescue" a soul.
And to rescue it from what is perceived to be a religion that has no respect for women.
Unfortunately such callous behaviour like history has a habit of repeating itself.
A case in point, the Alabama Biology Professor who killed her brother years ago ( but was never charged )
and now shot death her work colleagues.
Only time will tell.
And those hugging jurors will have someone else blood on their hands!Have your say here.
The jury that acquitted her never heard about a document police allegedly discovered she had downloaded entitled: How to Kill Your Parents, a complete guide.
The four-page document detailing ways of killing a person and disposing of their body was mentioned during the committal hearing but struck out for the trial because it was deemed too prejudicial.
However the 17 years old trainee nurse evidence on the doctor's alleged confession was played to the full.
Police also allegedly found a message to her boyfriend posted by Kaihana after the attack on an internet chat room saying, "it's all over, it's make-or-break time. I either get freed for life or I go to jail for life". Police allege they also have a recording of Kaihana telling her boyfriend: "Even if I do end up in jail for the rest of my life it is worth it."
And a forensic expert had found Mr Hussain's stab wound was "unlikely to have been self-inflicted".
The question is not " who did it? "
But , " what have the jurors done? "
In their myopia of seeing only a perceived " battle between Islam & Christianity, " they have lost sight of the fact that a soul did leave the world.
